<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profound Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.authenticeccentric.com/2005/03/27/profound-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.authenticeccentric.com/2005/03/27/profound-change/</link>
	<description>life on your own terms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:29:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.authenticeccentric.com/2005/03/27/profound-change/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.authenticeccentric.com/?p=4#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Chari! Thanks for popping in!

Actually, it isn&#039;t *really* OT - a lot of what I&#039;m going to be covering in this weblog is impacted by software and the various ways to use it. Besides, you&#039;re my first comment ;) (fitting, too! - for those of you who haven&#039;t gone to visit my original blog inspiration, do - I&#039;m adding SoapBoxBlog.com to my blogroll, go visit!)

I did settle on WP and I like it a lot. I have been using Blogger for a bunch of blogs and although it was working ok, I kept running into the categorization issue - blogs (good ones) sprawl. Without a taxonomy of sorts, the darn things get hard to follow and Blogger search sucks.

While I *adore* the MT install you did and it worked well for quite a while, the comment spam issues and my inability to maintain the durn software made it unacceptable in my book. 

Oh, and did I mention I *hate* the pricing structure? While I would have no problem recouping costs from my commercial blog clients, that wasn&#039;t my ultimate aim. I&#039;m behind on writing up my whole case notes but they&#039;ll all show up here now that I&#039;m done (mostly) playing with all the toys.

So, ok: WP vs MT from my perspective:

1. I am all about author empowerment. I did this all myself, not knowing much beyond the basics. The installation took less than 2 minutes and I was done. Uploading the custom plugins and graphics template took another minute and then I was live online - and if it crashes, I don&#039;t have to call anyone except myself. I know this b/c I&#039;ve already done it, twice LOL

2. Did I mention how nice and easy the plugin and template features are? I love all the choices and options the community has generously spawned, and I&#039;m deeply appreciative of not having to re-invent the wheel or beg for a programmer to add them. I think Alex King has gotten 80+ entires for the template contest, and some of them are quite good - there is a lot more variety freely available than with most other programs.

3. The templating system makes it easier for non-coders to get something customized. I haven&#039;t done this template yet (I&#039;m behind as usual) but I was able to take a pre-done template and customize this: http://www.officiallyqueer.com/ (it&#039;s on the wrong url but you can see it was easy peasy.)

4. Once I figure out how to use mod_rewrite I can create cruft free URLs - that is a big plus from the SEO side. 

5. Comment spam: I know MT has plugins and widgets to make it all stop, but I couldn&#039;t for the life of me figure out how to make them work. Call me stupid, but I didn&#039;t want to bug you - I wanted to figure it out myself. It was a basic premise of my original theorum - low touch solutions that empowered authors, not enabled programmers.

WP appears to have installed all their magic under the hood so it was covered with install. I suppose there are additonal plugins that expand protection further, but I can tell you I haven&#039;t had any spam at all since I ripped out MT and that was great, because I was getting 15-20 a day there for a while and it got old quick.

So, basically, I like  WP. It isn&#039;t perfect - I desperately need photoblog solutions and I haven&#039;t worked the bugs out of the tools available to me to use with WP, but otherwise, I see it as a pretty robust solution for new bloggers.

I am not knocking MT as a solution in general - I have and do recommend both MT and Typepad as solutions and they&#039;re working well for the people I know using them. For my purposes now, however, WP gave me the fastest and lowest cost of entry, so here we are. 

I know, sorry you asked, right? LOL

Thanks for stopping by - hope all is well in your world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chari! Thanks for popping in!</p>
<p>Actually, it isn&#8217;t *really* OT &#8211; a lot of what I&#8217;m going to be covering in this weblog is impacted by software and the various ways to use it. Besides, you&#8217;re my first comment <img src='http://www.AuthenticEccentric.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  (fitting, too! &#8211; for those of you who haven&#8217;t gone to visit my original blog inspiration, do &#8211; I&#8217;m adding SoapBoxBlog.com to my blogroll, go visit!)</p>
<p>I did settle on WP and I like it a lot. I have been using Blogger for a bunch of blogs and although it was working ok, I kept running into the categorization issue &#8211; blogs (good ones) sprawl. Without a taxonomy of sorts, the darn things get hard to follow and Blogger search sucks.</p>
<p>While I *adore* the MT install you did and it worked well for quite a while, the comment spam issues and my inability to maintain the durn software made it unacceptable in my book. </p>
<p>Oh, and did I mention I *hate* the pricing structure? While I would have no problem recouping costs from my commercial blog clients, that wasn&#8217;t my ultimate aim. I&#8217;m behind on writing up my whole case notes but they&#8217;ll all show up here now that I&#8217;m done (mostly) playing with all the toys.</p>
<p>So, ok: WP vs MT from my perspective:</p>
<p>1. I am all about author empowerment. I did this all myself, not knowing much beyond the basics. The installation took less than 2 minutes and I was done. Uploading the custom plugins and graphics template took another minute and then I was live online &#8211; and if it crashes, I don&#8217;t have to call anyone except myself. I know this b/c I&#8217;ve already done it, twice LOL</p>
<p>2. Did I mention how nice and easy the plugin and template features are? I love all the choices and options the community has generously spawned, and I&#8217;m deeply appreciative of not having to re-invent the wheel or beg for a programmer to add them. I think Alex King has gotten 80+ entires for the template contest, and some of them are quite good &#8211; there is a lot more variety freely available than with most other programs.</p>
<p>3. The templating system makes it easier for non-coders to get something customized. I haven&#8217;t done this template yet (I&#8217;m behind as usual) but I was able to take a pre-done template and customize this: <a href="http://www.officiallyqueer.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.officiallyqueer.com/</a> (it&#8217;s on the wrong url but you can see it was easy peasy.)</p>
<p>4. Once I figure out how to use mod_rewrite I can create cruft free URLs &#8211; that is a big plus from the SEO side. </p>
<p>5. Comment spam: I know MT has plugins and widgets to make it all stop, but I couldn&#8217;t for the life of me figure out how to make them work. Call me stupid, but I didn&#8217;t want to bug you &#8211; I wanted to figure it out myself. It was a basic premise of my original theorum &#8211; low touch solutions that empowered authors, not enabled programmers.</p>
<p>WP appears to have installed all their magic under the hood so it was covered with install. I suppose there are additonal plugins that expand protection further, but I can tell you I haven&#8217;t had any spam at all since I ripped out MT and that was great, because I was getting 15-20 a day there for a while and it got old quick.</p>
<p>So, basically, I like  WP. It isn&#8217;t perfect &#8211; I desperately need photoblog solutions and I haven&#8217;t worked the bugs out of the tools available to me to use with WP, but otherwise, I see it as a pretty robust solution for new bloggers.</p>
<p>I am not knocking MT as a solution in general &#8211; I have and do recommend both MT and Typepad as solutions and they&#8217;re working well for the people I know using them. For my purposes now, however, WP gave me the fastest and lowest cost of entry, so here we are. </p>
<p>I know, sorry you asked, right? LOL</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by &#8211; hope all is well in your world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chari</title>
		<link>http://www.authenticeccentric.com/2005/03/27/profound-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Chari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.authenticeccentric.com/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>So I see you&#039;ve ultimately decided on WordPress. How is it compared to MT? [I know, off-topic a bit...] I like your new design, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I see you&#8217;ve ultimately decided on WordPress. How is it compared to MT? [I know, off-topic a bit...] I like your new design, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
